The South Shore Press
← Back to Opinion
Opinion

Now Trending: RED Friday

A twenty-year-old chain-email tradition to wear red for deployed troops is trending harder than usual — because for the first time in a while, deployments are actually the story

By Henry Cameron
Now Trending: RED Friday
Credit: USN For Life

Every Friday on X, without fail, a wave of accounts posts some version of "Remember Everyone Deployed," often shortened to R.E.D. or just "Happy Red Friday." It's one of the internet's most durable, least controversial rituals — people wearing red clothing and posting hearts and flags to signal solidarity with troops stationed overseas. This week it trended harder than the usual background hum, and there's a real reason for that.

The tradition itself is almost comically mundane in its origins. Remember Everyone Deployed is believed to have originated in April 2015 with students at Mansfield University, who wore red-colored clothing on Fridays as a way to let all deployed service members know that they are remembered and appreciated. A competing origin story traces it further back, to a 2005 chain email, and a parallel Canadian movement organized by military spouses that eventually drew in Canada's own prime minister. Whichever version you believe, the point was always the same: a low-effort, non-political gesture — wear a red shirt, think about the people overseas for a second, move on with your day.

What's pushing it back into the conversation now isn't nostalgia — it's current events. Deployments have ramped up again amid an active conflict involving Iran, and the news cycle around it has been anything but reassuring. The Army's cancellation of the 82nd Airborne's training exercise, a unit famously capable of deploying 5,000 soldiers anywhere in the world within 18 hours, has done nothing to quiet the speculation.

Sen. Rand Paul has said, "Because there was no national discussion about going to war, we do not know whether ground troops will be used. We have no idea how long the war will last." Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has said the conflict could last eight weeks, while CENTCOM is reportedly planning for at least 100 days. The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, Gen. Dan Caine, told reporters to expect additional casualties, saying, "This is not a single, overnight operation."

Against that backdrop, the usual cheerful "Happy Friday, remember everyone deployed" posts are running alongside a much colder take. One widely circulating reply argues that the sentiment is naive at best, dismissing deployed service members as, in that poster's own words, people fighting wars "for the globalists" rather than for the country. It's a fringe framing, but it's not landing in a vacuum — it's arriving in a week where a sitting U.S. senator is publicly asking why Congress never actually voted on this war and the Pentagon's own leadership is warning the public to brace for a longer fight than anyone was told to expect.

In my opinion, you don't have to buy the "globalist" framing to notice that the underlying frustration has a legitimate root. RED Friday, at its best, is a small, decent gesture — a way for ordinary people to say they haven't forgotten the men and women standing post somewhere most Americans couldn't find on a map. That instinct deserves respect, and it's not political to feel it. But the anger creeping into the replies isn't really about the color red or about the troops themselves — it's about the fact that decisions to send those troops somewhere increasingly get made without the kind of public debate Senator Paul is pointing to, by officials who will never be the ones standing post. Wearing a red shirt on Friday is easy. Asking who actually decided this war was worth fighting, and whether the public ever really consented to it, is harder — and it's the question that actually matters.

You Might Also Be Interested In